Abstract

Purpose Factor analysis is the most used tool in organizational research and its widespread use in scale validations contribute to decision-making in management. However, standard factor analysis is not always applied correctly mainly due to the misuse of ordinal data as interval data and the inadequacy of the former for classical factor analysis. The purpose of this paper is to present and apply the Bayesian factor analysis for mixed data (BFAMD) in the context of empirical using the Bayesian paradigm for the construction of scales. Design/methodology/approach Ignoring the categorical nature of some variables often used in management studies, as the popular Likert scale, may result in a model with false accuracy and possibly biased estimates. To address this issue, Quinn (2004) proposed a Bayesian factor analysis model for mixed data, which is capable of modeling ordinal (qualitative measure) and continuous data (quantitative measure) jointly and allows the inclusion of qualitative information through prior distributions for the parameters’ model. This model, adopted here, presents considering advantages and allows the estimation of the posterior distribution for the latent variables estimated, making the process of inference easier. Findings The results show that BFAMD is an effective approach for scale validation in management studies making both exploratory and confirmatory analyses possible for the estimated factors and also allowing the analysts to insert a priori information regardless of the sample size, either by using the credible intervals for Factor Loadings or by conducting specific hypotheses tests. The flexibility of the Bayesian approach presented is counterbalanced by the fact that the main estimates used in factor analysis as uniqueness and communalities commonly lose their usual interpretation due to the choice of using prior distributions. Originality/value Considering that the development of scales through factor analysis aims to contribute to appropriate decision-making in management and the increasing misuse of ordinal scales as interval in organizational studies, this proposal seems to be effective for mixed data analyses. The findings found here are not intended to be conclusive or limiting but offer a useful starting point from which further theoretical and empirical research of Bayesian factor analysis can be built.

Highlights

  • Factor analysis was initially developed by sociologist Charles Spearman (Spearman, 1904) who proposed the hypothesis that the wide variety of psychological measures as mathematical, verbal and logical reasoning skills, among others, could be explained by an underlying factor of general intelligence namely “g”.Spearman (1904) developed what is known today as factor analysis, which has been widely used mainly to analyze the patterns of interrelationship between variables, to reduce the dimensionality of data, and to support the creation of scales (Rummel, 1988)

  • We have found a lack of studies in the literature with the objective to compare exploratory and ordinal factor analysis in scale validations

  • Bayesian factor analysis for mixed data Ignoring the categorical nature of some variables often used in management studies, as the popular Likert scale, may result in a model with false accuracy and possibly biased estimates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Factor analysis was initially developed by sociologist Charles Spearman (Spearman, 1904) who proposed the hypothesis that the wide variety of psychological measures as mathematical, verbal and logical reasoning skills, among others, could be explained by an underlying factor of general intelligence namely “g”.Spearman (1904) developed what is known today as factor analysis, which has been widely used mainly to analyze the patterns of interrelationship between variables, to reduce the dimensionality of data, and to support the creation of scales (Rummel, 1988). There are other problems that compromise the use of this technique such as the instability of parameters for small samples (Arrindell & Van der Ende, 1985; MacCallum, Widaman, Zhang, & Hong, 1999), the segregation between exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (Hurley et al, 1997; Suhr, 2006; Thompson, 2004) the impossibility of inserting prior information on both qualitative and quantitative estimation of the parameters and the difficulty of using mixed data such as ordinal, interval and ratio variables (Clinton & Lewis, 2008; Quinn, 2004) In spite of those questions, factor analysis is undoubtedly the most used tool in organizational research. It is disseminated in different fields, such as self-reports appraisal (Podsakoff & Organ, 1986), human resource management (Allen, Shore, & Griffeth, 2003; Aquino, 2000; Bradfield & Aquino, 1999; Hui & Lee, 2000; Lubatkin, Simsek, Ling, & Veiga, 2006; Schuler & Jackson, 1989; Stevens & Campion, 1999), work and family conflicts (Carlson & Perrewé, 1999), managerial communication (Gopinath & Becker, 2000), entrepreneurship (Zahra, Neubaum, & Huse, 2000), psychological climate (Tsai, 2001), performance (Kidder, 2002), leadership (Elenkov & Manev, 2005), and so forth

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call