Abstract

Empirical evidence abounds that asset returns exhibit characteristics such as volatility clustering, asymmetry, and heavy-tailedness. Volatility clustering describes the tendency of returns to alternate between periods of high volatility and low volatility. In addition, volatility responds asymmetrically to positive and negative return shocks—it tends to be higher when the market falls than when it rises. The nonconstancy of volatility has been suggested as an underlying reason for returns’ fat tails. Volatility models attempt to systematically explain these stylized facts about asset returns. The Bayesian methodology offers distinct advantages over the classical framework in estimating volatility models. Parameter restrictions, such as stationarity restriction, are notoriously difficult to handle within the frequentist setting and straightforward to implement in the Bayesian one. The MCMC numerical simulation methods facilitate greatly the estimation of complex volatility models, such as Markov-switching volatility models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.