Abstract

A novel Bayesian modeling framework for response accuracy (RA), response times (RTs) and other process data is proposed. In a Bayesian covariance structure modeling approach, nested and crossed dependences within test-taker data (e.g., within a testlet, between RAs and RTs for an item) are explicitly modeled. The local dependences are modeled directly through covariance parameters in an additive covariance matrix. The inclusion of random effects (on person or group level) is not necessary, which allows constructing parsimonious models for responses and multiple types of process data. Bayesian Covariance Structure Models (BCSMs) are presented for various well-known dependence structures. Through truncated shifted inverse-gamma priors, closed-form expressions for the conditional posteriors of the covariance parameters are derived. The priors avoid boundary effects at zero, and ensure the positive definiteness of the additive covariance structure at any layer. Dependences of categorical outcome data are modeled through latent continuous variables. In a simulation study, a BCSM for RAs and RTs is compared to van der Linden's hierarchical model (LHM; van der Linden, 2007). Under the BCSM, the dependence structure is extended to allow variations in test-takers' working speed and ability and is estimated with a satisfying performance. Under the LHM, the assumption of local independence is violated, which results in a biased estimate of the variance of the ability distribution. Moreover, the BCSM provides insight in changes in the speed-accuracy trade-off. With an empirical example, the flexibility and relevance of the BCSM for complex dependence structures in a real-world setting are discussed.

Highlights

  • Computer-based assessments (CBAs) provide the opportunity to gather responses times (RTs) and other process data in addition to the test-takers’ responses

  • The results indicate that it is necessary to model the implied covariance structure of the correlated person effects on each type of test-taker data (RAs, RTs, and TAs)

  • The variation in the data explained on a person level that is captured by the latent factors and their correlation is estimated through the corresponding layers in the additive covariance structure: modeling the person effects themselves is not required

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Computer-based assessments (CBAs) provide the opportunity to gather responses times (RTs) and other process data in addition to the test-takers’ responses. Contrary to common marginal modeling approaches such as generalized estimating equations (GEE) (Liang and Zeger, 1986; Diggle et al, 2013), the dependence structure is fully modeled in an additive covariance structure This allows testing for interaction effects (e.g., local dependence within testlets) (Lee and Neider, 2004), and to estimate random person/group effects post-hoc from the residuals of the model. Test-taker ability estimates can be obtained under a complex within-subject dependence structure, while accounting for various types of process data information. An additive covariance structure is defined that can be utilized to explicitly model dependences in data from different types (RAs, RTs, and other process data). The results, limitations and future prospects of the proposed framework for educational measurement applications are discussed

MODELING COVARIANCE STRUCTURES
The BCSM for Speed and Ability
Variable Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off
Blocked Structures of Cross-Covariances
Differential Blocked Structures of Cross-Covariances Across Factors
More Than Two Data Types
Model Scalability
CATEGORICAL OUTCOME DATA
BAYESIAN INFERENCE
SIMULATION STUDY
LHM for Fixed Speed and Ability
BCSM for Variable Speed and Ability
Data Generation
Results
EMPIRICAL EXAMPLE
Data Set
Dependence Structure
Statistical Model
DISCUSSION
24 Stimulus highlighting
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call