Abstract

Abstract Recent research has revealed that there exist large inter-driver differences in car-following behavior such that different car-following models may apply to different drivers. This study applies Bayesian techniques to the calibration of car-following models, where prior distributions on each model parameter are converted to posterior distributions. The priors and posteriors are then used to calculate the so-called ‘evidence’, which can be used to quantitatively assess how well different models explain one driver's car-following behavior. When considered over multiple drivers, the evidence represents probabilities for different models as a whole. These model probabilities can be used in a micro simulation, where for each driver first a model is drawn according to these probabilities, after which parameters are drawn from the posterior distribution for each parameter of that model that were obtained when calibrating the model. In a test case on actual data the Bayesian evidence indeed reveals inter-driver differences and it is shown how these differences can quantitatively be assessed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.