Abstract
We study a Bayes factor based on a robust test statistic, MAX3, for case-control genetic association studies. MAX3 is the maximum of three trend tests derived under the recessive, additive and dominant genetic models, respectively. The proposed Bayes factor, denoted as BFM, models the asymptotic distributions of MAX3 under the null and alternative hypotheses. It is compared to an existing Bayes factor based on Bayesian model averaging (BMA). Through simulation studies, we show that both BFM and BMA are robust under genetic model uncertainty. They both depend on specifying the prior distribution for the genetic model, and have similar performance when common objective priors are used. When the prior places a large probability on the true (wrong) genetic model, BMA (BFM) is more powerful. Applications to real data from a genome-wide association study are presented to illustrate their use and show their sensitivity under genetic model uncertainty.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.