Abstract
Abstract This paper argues for the adoption of a theoretical framework within which to conceptualize the design and evaluation of preventive interventions. The benefits to be gained by basing the field's activities within a conceptual model are reviewed in terms of their empirical and political implications. As evidence of the field's readiness for such a step, three existing theoretical options are examined-Bloom's life-events model, Tnckett's ecological model, and Rappaport's empowerment model. These models are compared with the transactional developmental model proposed by Sameroff as a viable framework for prevention programs and research. The field's rate of future progress is viewed as dependent on the organization of its activities within a paradigmatic structure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
