Abstract

BackgroundThe Government of the Republic of Kenya is in the process of implementing health care reforms. However, poor knowledge about costs of health care services is perceived as a major obstacle towards evidence-based, effective and efficient health care reforms. Against this background, the Ministry of Health of Kenya in cooperation with its development partners conducted a comprehensive costing exercise and subsequently developed the Kenya Health Sector Costing Model in order to fill this data gap.MethodsBased on standard methodology of costing of health care services in developing countries, standard questionnaires and analyses were employed in 207 health care facilities representing different trustees (e.g. Government, Faith Based/Nongovernmental, private-for-profit organisations), levels of care and regions (urban, rural). In addition, a total of 1369 patients were randomly selected and asked about their demand-sided costs. A standard step-down costing methodology was applied to calculate the costs per service unit and per diagnosis of the financial year 2006/2007.ResultsThe total costs of essential health care services in Kenya were calculated as 690 million Euros or 18.65 Euro per capita. 54% were incurred by public sector facilities, 17% by Faith Based and other Nongovernmental facilities and 23% in the private sector. Some 6% of the total cost is due to the overall administration provided directly by the Ministry and its decentralised organs. Around 37% of this cost is absorbed by salaries and 22% by drugs and medical supplies. Generally, costs of lower levels of care are lower than of higher levels, but health centres are an exemption. They have higher costs per service unit than district hospitals.ConclusionsThe results of this study signify that the costs of health care services are quite high compared with the Kenyan domestic product, but a major share are fixed costs so that an increasing coverage does not necessarily increase the health care costs proportionally. Instead, productivity will rise in particular in under-utilized private health care institutions. The results of this study also show that private-for-profit health care facilities are not only the luxurious providers catering exclusively for the rich but also play an important role in the service provision for the poorer population. The study findings also demonstrated a high degree of cost variability across private providers, suggesting differences in quality and efficiencies.

Highlights

  • The Government of the Republic of Kenya is in the process of implementing health care reforms

  • HSSP II provided the blueprint to innovations like the definition of a “Kenya Essential Package of Health” (KEPH), a “Community Strategy”, a “Joint Framework of Work and Financing” (JPWD) as expression of the Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) and a “Hospital Reform” aiming at more autonomy for provincial hospitals

  • Total actual cost of health care services Based on the model we can calculate the total cost of health care services in Kenya in the financial year 2006/ 2007 as 63 billion Ksh which is equivalent to 690 million Euros or 18.65 Euro per capita1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Government of the Republic of Kenya is in the process of implementing health care reforms. Poor knowledge about costs of health care services is perceived as a major obstacle towards evidencebased, effective and efficient health care reforms. Against this background, the Ministry of Health of Kenya in cooperation with its development partners conducted a comprehensive costing exercise and subsequently developed the Kenya Health Sector Costing Model in order to fill this data gap. Most indicators showed a health care services for the majority of rural and urban poor has deteriorated. The Government of the Republic of Kenya realized this negative development and responded with health care reform. Implementing the new constitution which was promulgated in August 2010 will impact on the system design of the Kenyan Health Sector, especially in terms of decentralisation and realising the ‘Right to Health’ [8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call