Abstract

Flood-based Agricultural Systems (FAS), which rely on temporary floods, provide livelihoods for nearly 50 million smallholder farmers across water-stressed African basins. This paper analyses the impact of externally driven agricultural production and productivity improvement interventions in FAS, taking the Ethiopian Fogera floodplain as a case study. Ostroms’ Governing the Commons Principles were used as analytical framework. Field data was gathered through focus group discussions and interviews with 266 farmers and pastoralists, and 10 local administration staff, while the AquaCrop model was used to simulate maize yield under varied floodwater management and farming practices. The interventions in the Fogera floodplain replaced vital maize and teff food crops with high-return upstream rice cultivation. It has characteristics similar to other interventions across Africa: 1) inadequate integration of local agricultural water management practices; 2) narrow focus on short-term economic gains and insufficient attention to long-term sustainability of livelihoods and environmental issues; and 3) lack of detailed ex-ante analysis of basin-wide consequences – it failed to prioritize the needs of downstream vegetable producers and pastoralists using shallow wells. The intervention missed several low-cost opportunities, including the establishment of rules to protect downstream water rights; the construction of gabion-strengthened on-farm structures to efficiently distribute floods or raised brick-walls to reinforce shallow wells; and the implementation of measures for improved soil fertility and weed management. The study establishes that these missed opportunities could have enhanced livelihoods by doubling rice yield to 6 tons/ha; increased teff and maize harvests by one-third, to 3 and 5 tons/ha respectively; and mitigated 25% vegetable yield loss and 40% reduction in grazing land. These opportunities could have also produced environmental benefits, including reduced soil moisture and fertility depletion. Lessons from the Fogera floodplain on making interventions cost-effective and considering basin-wide livelihood impacts are relevant to FAS globally.

Highlights

  • Flood-based Agricultural Systems (FAS) have received relatively little research and investment attention as compared to perennial irri­ gation systems (Puertas et al, 2015)

  • There are four widely practiced FAS: (1) floodplain agriculture – the cultivation of floodplains using receding and/or rising floodwater; (2) flood inundation canal systems – where canals fed by temporarily high-water levels in rivers irrigate adjacent low-lying fields; (3) spate irrigation, which makes use of short duration floods generated from mountain catchments; and (4) depression agriculture – shallow, seasonally waterlogged depressions that retain sufficient moisture for dry season grazing and crop production (Kool et al, 2017)

  • The annual average rainfall in the mountainous catchment upstream of the lake and the rivers is about 1200 mm. This gradually decreases towards the lowlands reaching its lowest amount of about 400 mm in the downstream Fogera floodplain where rainfall is more erratic in nature (Nederveen et al, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flood-based Agricultural Systems (FAS) have received relatively little research and investment attention as compared to perennial irri­ gation systems (Puertas et al, 2015). They are, substantial: they cover an estimated 25 million ha across arid and semi-arid Africa where they provide food and fodder for nearly 50 million farmers irri­ gating, on average, 0.5 ha (Kool et al, 2017). Floodplain agriculture, complemented by flood inundation system, is the focus of this paper It is the most extensive system covering nearly two-thirds of the total 25 million ha potential of FAS in arid and semi-arid Africa (Puertas et al, 2015). The significant shift to rice took place in the last decade

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.