Abstract
AbstractThe relative merits of compiling and interpreting BASIC are examined, and these methods are compared with the technique called throw‐away compiling. The comparison reveals that a throw‐away compiler has much to recommend it, and some reasons for its superior performance are explained. The BASIC programs used for the performance tests are analysed, both statically and dynamically, and certain features are picked out for comment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
