Abstract
Boghossian has an interesting and insightful account of basic statements. For him, the explanation of such cases provides the necessary footing for the claim that objectively correct language use is settled by epistemic rules and that linguistic normativity is, if anything, epistemic normativity in disguise. What he is after, then, is an account which buttresses the assimilation of factual and semantic correctness by adducing a specific conception of epistemological correctness.KeywordsJustify BeliefBasic BeliefDeductive ReasoningLogical ConstantModus PonensThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
