Abstract

Aim. The article deals with some of the features of objective side of illegal hunting and problems of their applying under the current legislation. We give the most accurate interpretation of the direct objects of illegal hunting which are the following: public relations to ensure the safety, rational use, rehabilitation and reproduction of freeliving wild animals and birds and the preservation of the number of animals required. Methodology. We use methods of description and interpretation. Results. We identified some features of illegal hunting: a) without authorization; b) despite the specific prohibition; c) by person not having the right to hunt or having a license without proper grounds; d) hunting outside of the designated areas; e) hunting in closed seasons; e) prohibited hunting tools and methods. Main conclusions. From legislation, permissions for hunting are the following: hunting permits, hunting license; nominal one-time license for the hunting of animals and birds, the contract on delivery of meat and furs, etc. It is found that in Russia the hunting farms are in a poor state because of the lack of well-established legal and regulatory framework; the lack of effective management and the negative impact of the reforms as a whole; when normative legal acts are being developed, the centuries-old experience of foreign countries and the opinion of scientists and hunters are not taken into account.

Highlights

  • We identified some features of illegal hunting: a) without authorization; b) despite the specific prohibition; c) by person not having the right to hunt or having a license without proper grounds; d) hunting outside of the designated areas; e) hunting in closed seasons; e) prohibited hunting tools and methods

  • - при разработке нормативнопроса, следует отметить, что в последние правовых актов не учитывается многоведва десятилетия охотхозяйства и охотуго- ковой опыт зарубежных стран и мнение дия в России находятся в кризисном со- ученых-охотоведов, и поэтому прогноз на стоянии, причинами которого являются: перспективу неутешительный;

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В сложившейся обстановке ученым ное использование, восстановление и предстояло научно обоснованно сформу- умножение диких зверей и птиц, находялировать объект незаконной охоты и объ- щихся в состоянии естественной свободы, ективные признаки состава незаконной и сохранение необходимой численности охоты. Что говорят ученые-охотоведы по роны преступления, предусмотренного ст. Ерофеев под непосредственным конности охоты необходимо наличие в объектом незаконной охоты понимает действиях виновного одного из признаков, «возможности пользователей животным альтернативно указанных в рассматриваемиром (дикой наземной фауной), которые мой статье.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.