Basic goods, the effects of commodity transfers and the international economic order

Abstract

A two good, two region and three income group macro model is constructed to explore possible effects of aid on distribution of welfare. One region, the North, has two income groups characterized by different endowments and proportions of consumption of the basic and the luxury goods. We study policies that result in transfers of goods from the high income group of the North to the South. In one case, the transfer is of luxury or investment goods; under the conditions, it is shown to produce a change in relative prices that induces an increase in the welfare of the North and decreases the welfare of the South, even under conditions of (Walrasian) stability of the markets. In a second case, the high income group in the North transfers, instead, basic goods to the South. It is shown that under the conditions an increase in welfare of the South can only occur at the expense of a decrease in welfare of the low income group in the North. Therefore, in general, aid in the form of commodity transfers cannot be relied upon to equalize overall welfare: under the conditions there is necessarily a trade-off between more North-South equality and greater equality within the North. When aid is endorsed to pursue NIEO objectives, a close examination of international and domestic markets seems in order, so as to avoid the conditions studied here. The formation of (international) coalitions among the different groups is also discussed.