Abstract
Review of accumulated data in the medical literature on renovascular hypertension underscores the lack of uniformity of opinion regarding important clinical characteristics, indications for evaluation, screening and definitive diagnostic tools, and choice of therapeutic options. Much of this lack of uniformity stems from the collection Of data in preselected and screened subgroups of the hypertensive population, the lack of standardization of diagnostic methods, the continuous introduction of new diagnostic tools, and the heterogenicity of results from respective methods of management. This review summarizes available data pertaining to renovascular hypertension and serves as a reference from which areas of controversy may be identified and subsequently resolved. From the Section on General Surgery, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
