Abstract

BackgroundPeripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents a heterogeneous and rare subgroup of aggressive lymphomas that generally demonstrate poor clinical outcomes with conventional treatment. Since the prognosis of PTCL is heterogeneous, more accurate risk assessment, and risk‐adapted treatment strategies are required. In this study, we examined whether interim positron emission tomography (iPET)‐computed tomography (PET/CT) results can be combined with baseline volume‐based metabolic assessments including total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for risk stratification in PTCL.MethodsThe data of 63 patients with nodal PTCL, who had analyzable baseline PET/CT and iPET, were retrospectively reviewed. We calculated the baseline TMTV and TLG values. All iPET responses were analyzed using the Deauville 5‐point scale.ResultsOn univariate analysis, a prognostic index for PTCL (PIT) higher than 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; P = .026), high TMTV (>389 cm3; HR, 2.24; P = .01), high TLG (>875; HR, 3.77; P = .0005), and positive iPET (HR, 2.18; P = .009) were significantly associated with poorer progression‐free survival (PFS). On multivariate analysis, only high TLG and positive iPET independently predicted both poorer overall survival (OS) and PFS. A model combining TLG and iPET showed that patients with low TLG and negative iPET had superior outcomes, with a 5‐year PFS and OS of 72% and 90%, respectively. Conversely, both 5‐year PFS and OS for those with high TLG and positive iPET were 0%.ConclusionsIn summary, TLG combined with iPET predicted survival in PTCL more accurately. This information may help in the development of risk‐adapted treatment strategies for PTCL.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.