Abstract

Abstract Purpose Current estimations of the climate impact from indirect land use change (ILUC) caused by biofuels are heavily influenced by assumptions regarding the biofuel production period. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new method (baseline time accounting) that takes global land use dynamics into account that is consistent with the global warming potential, that is applicable to any phenomenon causing land use change, and that is independent of production period assumptions. Methods We consider ILUC in two forms. The first is called “accelerated expansion” and concerns ILUC in regions with an expanding agricultural area. The second is called “delayed reversion” and concerns ILUC in regions with a decreasing agricultural area. We use recent trends in international land use and projections of future land use change to assess how ILUC from biofuels will alter the development in global agricultural land use dynamics compared to the existing trend (i.e., the baseline development). We then use the definition of the global warming potential to determine the CO2 equivalence of the change in land use dynamics. Results and discussion We apply baseline time accounting to two existing ILUC studies in the literature. With current trends in global agricultural land use, the method significantly reduces the estimated climate impact in the previous ILUC studies (by more than half). Sensitivity analyses show that results are somewhat sensitive to assumptions regarding carbon sequestration and assumptions regarding postreversion ecosystems. Conclusions The global dynamic development in land use has important implications for the time accounting step when estimating the climate impact of ILUC caused by biofuel production or other issues affecting land use. Ignoring this may lead to erroneous conclusions about the actual climate impact of ILUC. Several land use projections indicate that the global agricultural area will keep expanding up to and beyond 2050. We therefore recommend to apply the baseline time accounting concept as an integrated part of future ILUC studies and to update the results on a regular basis.

Highlights

  • Liquid biofuels provide a renewable alternative to fossil fuels in the transportation sector

  • With current trends in global agricultural land use, the method significantly reduces the estimated climate impact in the previous indirect land use change (ILUC) studies

  • The global dynamic development in land use has important implications for the time accounting step when estimating the climate impact of ILUC caused by biofuel production or other issues affecting land use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liquid biofuels provide a renewable alternative to fossil fuels in the transportation sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess (2013) 18:319–330 corresponding number in the GREET Model version 1.8d (Argonne National Laboratory 2010b) is 53 g CO2e/MJ (Argonne National Laboratory 2010a) This includes the energy efficiency improvements in ethanol production documented by Mueller (2010). The resulting drop in the supply of feed or food can cause a relative increase in agricultural prices, which could provide incentives to increase production elsewhere (Kløverpris et al 2008). To some extent, this production increase may come from conversion of new land to agricultural land, and this may result in GHG emissions, e.g. from forest clearing. We will refer to the concept as “baseline time accounting.”

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call