Abstract
We used baseline data from the PICNIC longitudinal study to investigate structural, functional, behavioural and heritable metrics that may predict future myopia in young children. Cycloplegic refractive error (M) and optical biometry were obtained in 97 young children with functional emmetropia. Children were classified as high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) for myopia based on parental myopia and M. Other metrics included axial length (AXL), axial length/corneal radius (AXL/CR) and refractive centile curves. Based on the PICNIC criteria, 46 children (26 female) were classified as HR (M=+0.62 ± 0.44 D, AXL=22.80 ± 0.64 mm) and 51 (27 female) as LR (M=+1.26 ± 0.44 D, AXL=22.77 ± 0.77 mm). Based on centiles, 49 children were HR, with moderate agreement compared with the PICNIC classification (k=0.65, p< 0.01). ANCOVA with age as a covariate showed a significant effect for AXL (p< 0.01), with longer AXL and deeper anterior chamber depth (ACD) (p=0.01) in those at HR (differences AXL=0.16 mm, ACD=0.13 mm). Linear regression models showed that central corneal thickness (CCT), ACD, posterior vitreous depth (PVD) (=AXL - CCT - ACD-lensthickness(LT)), corneal radius (CR) and age significantly predicted M (R=0.64, p< 0.01). Each 1.00 D decrease in hyperopia was associated with a 0.97 mm elongation in PVD and 0.43 mm increase in CR. The ratio AXL/CR significantly predicted M (R=-0.45, p< 0.01), as did AXL (R=-0.25, p=0.01), although to a lesser extent. Although M and AXL were highly correlated, the classification of pre-myopic children into HR or LR was significantly different when using each parameter, with AXL/CR being the most predictive metric. At the end of the longitudinal study, we will be able to assess the predictability of each metric.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.