Baseline hepatitis C virus resistance-associated substitutions present at frequencies lower than 15% may be clinically significant.

Abstract

BackgroundControversy is ongoing about whether a minority mutant present at frequencies below 15% may be clinically relevant and should be considered to guide treatment.MethodsResistance-associated substitution (RAS) studies were performed in patients before and at failure of antiviral treatments using Next-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) sequencing (NGS).ResultsWe have found two patients with genotype 1a infection having RAS in 3.5%–7.1% of the viral population at baseline that were selected during ledipasvir + sofosbuvir treatment. Co-selection of RAS located in a region not directly affected by the antiviral treatment also occurred. This observation calls into question, the recommendations to guide RAS-based direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment only when RAS are present in >15% of the sequences generated.ConclusionOur results suggests that RAS study should include all three HCV DAA target proteins and minority mutants should be considered as clinically relevant.