Abstract

Background: Both baseline blood pressure (BP) and cumulative BP have been used to estimate cardiovascular event (CVE) risk of higher BP, but which one is more reliable for recommendation to routine clinical practice is unclear.Methods: In this prospective study, conducted in the Kailuan community of Tanshan City, China, a total of 95,702 participants free of CVEs at baseline (2006–2007) were included and followed up until 2017. Time-weighted cumulative BP that expresses the extent of cumulative BP exposure is defined as the sum of the mean of two consecutive systolic or diastolic BP times the interval between the two determinations, then normalized by the total follow-up duration. Incident CVEs during 2006–2017 were confirmed by review of medical records. We performed a competing risk regression analysis to assess CVE risk of the different durations of higher BP exposure. ROC analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of higher BP on CVE occurrence.Results: We found that when the risk of higher BP on CVE occurrence was estimated based on time-weighted cumulative BP, the hazard ratios (HRs) increased with the increase in duration of higher BP exposure in each of the four BP groups: <120/<80, 120–129/<80, 130–139/80–89, and ≥140/≥90 mmHg; this time trend also occurred across the four different BP groups, with the higher BP group exhibiting CVE risk earlier during the follow-up. These results were confirmed by the same analysis performed on participants without baseline hypertension. However, such reasonable time trends did not occur when a single baseline BP was used as the primary estimation. We also demonstrated that the predictive values of baseline systolic and diastolic BP that predict CVE occurrence were only 0.6–3.2 and 0.2–3.1% lower, respectively, than those of cumulative BP combined with baseline BP during follow-up.Conclusions: Baseline BP remains a useful indicator for predicting future occurrence of CVEs. Nevertheless, time-weighted cumulative BP could more reliably estimate the CVE risk of higher BP exposure than baseline BP.

Highlights

  • Hypertension is highly prevalent in the adult population, affecting about 1.13 billion adults worldwide, of which 226 million are in China [1]

  • We further found that the time trend of hazard ratios (HRs) occurred across the different blood pressure (BP) groups compared with the time-weighted cumulative BP of

  • Since baseline BP is commonly used in the prediction of CVE occurrence currently, we examined the extent that baseline BP alone could precisely predict the occurrence of CVEs by performing a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hypertension is highly prevalent in the adult population, affecting about 1.13 billion adults worldwide, of which 226 million are in China [1]. The effect of a higher BP on CVEs has been frequently estimated based on baseline BP measurement [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Cumulative BP seems to be superior than baseline BP in estimating CVE risk of high BP theoretically, no population studies have yet to verify this presumption Overall, it remains unclear whether cumulative BP vs baseline BP determination is more reliable for recommendation to routine clinical practice. Both baseline blood pressure (BP) and cumulative BP have been used to estimate cardiovascular event (CVE) risk of higher BP, but which one is more reliable for recommendation to routine clinical practice is unclear

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call