Base stacking in cytosine dimer. A comparison of correlatedab initio calculations with three empirical potential models and density functional theory calculations

Abstract

Ab initio MP2/6-31G* interaction energies were calculated for more than 80 geometries of stacked cytosine dimer. Diffuse polarization functions were used to properly cover the dispersion energy. The results of ab initio calculations were compared with those obtained from three electrostatic empirical potential models, constructed as the sum of a Lennard-Jones potential (covering dispersion and repulsion contributions) and the electrostatic term. Point charges and point multipoles of the electrostatic term were also obtained at the MP2/6-31G* level of theory. The point charge MEP model (atomic charges derived from molecular electrostatic potential) satisfactorily reproduced the ab initio data. Addition of π-charges localized below and above the cytosine plane did not affect the calculated energies. The model employing the distributed multipole analysis gave worse agreement with the ab initio data than the MEP approach. The MP2 MEP charges were also derived using larger sets of atomic orbitals: cc-pVDZ, 6-311 + G(2d, p), and aug-cc-pVDZ. Differences between interaction energies calculated using these three sets of point charges and the MP2/6-31G* charges were smaller than 0.8 kcal/mol. The correlated ab initio calculations were also compared with the density functional theory (DFT) method. DFT calculations well reproduced the electrostatic part of interaction energy. They also covered some nonelectrostatic short-range effects which were not reproduced by the empirical potentials. The DFT method does not include the dispersion energy. This energy, approximated by an empirical term, was therefore added to the DFT interaction energy. The resulting interaction energy exhibited an artifact secondary minimum for a 3.9-4.0 vertical separation of bases. This defect is inherent in the DFT functionals, because it is not observed for the Hartree-Fock + dispersion interaction energy.© 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.