Basal insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes – does one size fit all? Lessons from the HypoDeg trial based on single-patient outcomes

Abstract

AimsIn the HypoDeg trial, a randomised crossover trial in people with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia, treatment with insulin degludec (IDeg) resulted in significantly reduced rates of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemia and all-day severe hypoglycaemia compared to insulin glargine U100 (IGlar). We analysed HypoDeg data at a single-patient level to assess the proportion of participants to whom the overall result applied. MethodsPost hoc analysis using single-patient data (n=133) on nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemia, all-day severe hypoglycaemia and HbA1c. The outcome was classified as superior with IDeg, superior with IGlar, or similar between treatments for the three outcomes. We also assessed a composite endpoint based on these outcomes to evaluate the overall superior treatment for each participant. ResultsA higher percentage (38%) had IDeg as superior treatment compared to IGlar (15%) for nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemia (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the treatments for all-day severe hypoglycaemia or HbA1c. A higher percentage (44%) had a composite endpoint favouring IDeg compared to IGlar (16%) (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThe superiority of IDeg was confirmed in many of the participants. However, a minority had IGlar as superior treatment, underscoring the need for individualised basal insulin therapy in clinical practice.