Abstract

Because the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry has to be anomalous to solve the strong CP puzzle, some colored and chiral fermions have to transform non-trivially under this symmetry. But when the SM fermions are charged, as in the PQ or DFSZ models, this symmetry ends up entangled with the SM global symmetries, baryon (B) and lepton (L) numbers. This raises several questions addressed in this paper. First, the compatibility of axion models with some explicit B and/or L violating effects is analyzed, including those arising from seesaw mechanisms, electroweak instanton interactions, or explicit B and L violating effective operators. Second, how many of these effects can be simultaneously present is quantified, along with the consequences for the axion mass and vacuum alignment if too many of them are introduced. Finally, large classes of B and/or L violating interactions without impact on axion phenomenology are identified, like for example the various implementations of the type I and II seesaw mechanisms in the DFSZ context.

Highlights

  • Even if the simplest axion models introduced more than 40 years ago have been ruled out, axions still remain one of the best solutions for the strong CP problem of the Standard Model (SM)

  • IV, we investigate the impact of baryon number violation on axion models and explore what would happen if further explicit B- and/or L-violating interactions were introduced in the theory

  • Show that axion phenomenology is essentially unaffected by neutrino masses, we review three realizations

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Even if the simplest axion models introduced more than 40 years ago have been ruled out, axions still remain one of the best solutions for the strong CP problem of the Standard Model (SM). In a previous study [9], we have described that, for this class of models, the fermion charges are necessarily ambiguous because of the presence of the accidental Uð1Þ symmetries of the SM, corresponding to the conserved baryon (B) and lepton (L) numbers Though this ambiguity was found to have no impact on the low-energy phenomenology, it raises several questions that we want to address in the present paper. We will see that the fermion charges for all PQ and DFSZ-like models based on the same Yukawa couplings, whether with a seesaw mechanism of type I or II or with some (limited) B violation, are equivalent Despite their very different appearance in terms of effective interactions, those models cannot be distinguished at low energy.

FERMION CHARGE AMBIGUITIES IN AXION MODELS
Axion in the PQ model
Axion in DFSZ model
AXIONS AND LEPTON NUMBER VIOLATION
PQ and DFSZ with a type-I seesaw mechanism
Merging DFSZ with a type-I seesaw mechanism
PQ and DFSZ with a type-II seesaw mechanism
AXIONS AND BARYON NUMBER VIOLATION
Dynamical B violation
Effective B violation
Vacuum realignments
Scenario I
Scenario II: A viable scenario with many ΔB and ΔL operators
Scenario III
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call