Abstract

Beta regressions are commonly used with responses that assume values in the standard unit interval, such as rates, proportions and concentration indices. Hypothesis testing inferences on the model parameters are typically performed using the likelihood ratio test. It delivers accurate inferences when the sample size is large, but can otherwise lead to unreliable conclusions. It is thus important to develop alternative tests with superior finite sample behavior. We derive the Bartlett correction to the likelihood ratio test under the more general formulation of the beta regression model, i.e. under varying precision. The model contains two submodels, one for the mean response and a separate one for the precision parameter. Our interest lies in performing testing inferences on the parameters that index both submodels. We use three Bartlett-corrected likelihood ratio test statistics that are expected to yield superior performance when the sample size is small. We present Monte Carlo simulation evidence on the finite sample behavior of the Bartlett-corrected tests relative to the standard likelihood ratio test and to two improved tests that are based on an alternative approach. The numerical evidence shows that one of the Bartlett-corrected typically delivers accurate inferences even when the sample is quite small. An empirical application related to behavioral biometrics is presented and discussed.

Highlights

  • Regression models are useful for gaining knowledge on how different variables impact the mean behavior of a variable of interest

  • The response means are modeled using a set of covariates and φ is assumed constant across observations. This model became known as the fixed precision beta regression model

  • We show that by using corrected likelihood ratio tests we arrive at a varying precision beta regression model different from that used by the authors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regression models are useful for gaining knowledge on how different variables (known as regressors, covariates or independent variables) impact the mean behavior of a variable of interest (known as dependent variable or response). We show that by using corrected likelihood ratio tests we arrive at a varying precision beta regression model different from that used by the authors. We derive the Bartlett correction to the likelihood ratio test in varying precision beta regressions and use it in three modified test statistics. We shall not pursue these approaches since, as we shall see, the standard Bartlett corrected test is able to deliver extremely accurate inference in small samples in varying precision beta regressions even when the number of nuisance parameters is large. In what follows we shall present Monte Carlo simulation results on the finite sample performances of six tests in varying precision beta regressions, namely: ω, ωb (‘ratio-like’), ωb (‘exponentially adjusted’), ωb (‘multiplicative-like’), ωa and ωa.

À mi logð iÞ
À mi pfifififi i
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call