Abstract

Despite its acknowledged importance in health management, particularly when dealing with such sensitive issues that transcend the boundaries of health as sexuality, stigma and discrimination, there is little research on the efficacy of interpersonal communication (IPC) in health programmes in Kenya. Consequently, little is documented on barriers to IPC in the implementation of health interventions. We examined specific potential barriers to IPC as an integral device in the implementation of the voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programme in Siaya, Kenya. We used a mixed-methods sequential cross-sectional research design, and the multi-stage sampling technique – combining purposive and chain referral sampling procedures to arrive at the desired samples. Two questionnaires were administered on 370 male residents of Bondo and Rarieda in Siaya; and on 35 implementers of the programme in the two sub-counties. Further, we interviewed five managers from the implementing agencies. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse quantitative data, and presented the findings through text and tables, while qualitative data were analysed through the description, analysis and interpretation process. The findings show time constraints as a significant barrier chiefly from the viewpoint of the operational staff, who admitted lacking time for meaningful interactions with their clients to fully explain issues raised for desired mutual understanding. Culture, in its various forms, has a significant negative cross-cutting bearing on provider-client interactions, while provider-client language difference, coupled with service providers’ attitude and jargons had a potential negative effect on the VMMC programme’s final outcome, at least from the clients’ perspective. We recommend full integration of IPC in healthcare management. Communication training should be accorded its due prominence, both in terms of scope and depth, in all heath training institutions. We further vouch for service provider cultural competence to enhance understanding. IPC can play a crucial role in healthcare management in Kenya due to its ability to facilitate important provider-client transaction, particularly in the largely oral rural resource-deprived populations, which lack adequate access to mass communication media. This study has discussed a raft of potential barriers to IPC, and provides significant insights to planners and managers of management of health programmes and interventions. Keywords: Siaya, Kenya; healthcare; interpersonal communication; barriers; cultural nuances; voluntary male circumcision. DOI: 10.7176/JHMN/72-10 Publication date: March 31 st 2020

Highlights

  • Kenya ranks among the world’s highest Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) epidemic burden countries, with about 1.6 million people in the country living with HIV and about 46,000 new infections across all ages in 2018 (Avert, 2018)

  • The remaining four sub-counties of Siaya, namely Alego Usonga, Gem, Ugunja and Ugenya, had under 10 per cent, while those from outside Siaya County accounted for 11.1%

  • This study focused on specific factors and examined, from the perspective of both the health workers and clients, their potential to hamper interpersonal communication (IPC) in the implementation of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programme in Siaya County

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kenya ranks among the world’s highest Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) epidemic burden countries, with about 1.6 million people in the country living with HIV and about 46,000 new infections across all ages in 2018 (Avert, 2018). The epidemic is geographically diverse, ranging from a high prevalence of 21 percent in Siaya, 20.7% in Homa Bay, 16.3% in Kisumu and 13.3% in Migori – all in the Lake Victoria region of western Kenya, to a low prevalence of 0.8% in Garissa, 0.2% in Mandera and 0.1% in Wajir respectively – all in Kenya’s north eastern region (Ministry of Health, 2018). Became one of the 14 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa to incorporate VMMC as a component of their national HIV/AIDS prevention programmes (World Health Organization, 2013). All these countries, known in the UNAIDS circles as priority countries, have high prevalence of HIV and a corresponding low incidence of male circumcision. It is estimated that nearly half of all uncircumcised men are found in this region, where circumcision prevalence is only 48.2% against the national average of 85% (National AIDS Control Council (2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call