Abstract

Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals, not all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receive treatment. This retrospective, multi-centre, noninterventional, case-control study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection initiating (control) or not initiating (case) treatment at 43 sites in Germany from September 2017 to June 2018. It aimed to compare characteristics of the two patient populations and to identify factors involved in patient/physician decision to initiate/not initiate chronic hepatitis C virus treatment, with a particular focus on historical barriers. Overall, 793 patients were identified: 573 (72%) who received treatment and 220 (28%) who did not. In 42% of patients, the reason for not initiating treatment was patient wish, particularly due to fear of treatment (17%) or adverse events (13%). Other frequently observed reasons for not initiating treatment were in accordance with known historical barriers for physicians to initiate therapy, including perceived or expected lack of compliance (14.5%), high patient age (10.9%), comorbidities (15.0%), alcohol abuse (9.1%), hard drug use (7.7%), and opioid substitution therapy (4.5%). Patient wish against therapy was also a frequently reported reason for not initiating treatment in the postponed (35.2%) and not planned (47.0%) subgroups; of note, known historical factors were also common reasons for postponing treatment. Real-world and clinical trial evidence is accumulating, which suggests that such historical barriers do not negatively impact treatment effectiveness. Improved education is key to facilitate progress towards the World Health Organization target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030.

Highlights

  • The treatment landscape for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection has been dramatically improved with the advent of all-oral, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies [1, 2]

  • Since 2016, three pangenotypic DAA regimens–sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P)–have been approved for the treatment of CHC by the European Medicines Agency [3,4,5]

  • DAAs can be prescribed by a wide range of health care professionals (HCPs) experienced in treating patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), including general practitioners and specialists across different relevant disciplines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The treatment landscape for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection has been dramatically improved with the advent of all-oral, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies [1, 2]. Since 2016, three pangenotypic DAA regimens–sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P)–have been approved for the treatment of CHC by the European Medicines Agency [3,4,5]. DAAs can be prescribed by a wide range of health care professionals (HCPs) experienced in treating patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), including general practitioners and specialists across different relevant disciplines (eg, hepatologists, infectious disease experts, and addiction specialists). Despite these advances, 71 million people globally are chronically infected with HCV, up to 80% of whom remain undiagnosed [18]. Few countries are on target to meet WHO elimination targets by 2030 [20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call