Barriers to electronic medical record implementation: a comparison between ophthalmology and other surgical specialties in Canada

Abstract

ObjectiveIn the present study, the barriers limiting widespread adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) among Canadian ophthalmologists were evaluated in comparison with physicians from other surgical specialities. The published literature regarding EMR use in ophthalmic practice was also reviewed. DesignPopulation-based, cross-sectional study. ParticipantsA total of 1199 Canadian surgeons participating in the 2014 National Physician Survey (NPS). MethodsData regarding speciality surgeons’ adoption of EMR programs were extracted from the 2014 NPS, a nationwide survey of practicing physicians in Canada. The data were entered into a spreadsheet, and basic statistical analyses, including χ2 analyses, were performed to compare the responses of ophthalmologists to other surgeons. ResultsCompared with other surgeons, ophthalmologists surveyed were significantly more likely to identify the following barriers to EMR adoption: “no suitable product for my practice” (p = 0.01), “too costly” (p = 0.0006), “too time consuming” (p < 0.0001), and “planning to retire soon” (p = 0.001). No statistically detectable differences were found between ophthalmologists and other surgeons for the following barriers: privacy concerns, reliability concerns, and lack of training. ConclusionsThe barriers that limit increased EMR adoption among Canadian ophthalmologists are different from those of other surgeons. This may be attributed to unique features of the field, including heavy reliance on hand-drawn figures in documentation, high patient volume, and the high costs associated with independent practice. Given the well-established benefits of EMR technology, consideration should be given to implementing strategies to mitigate these barriers. Additional research may help determine which specific improvements can be made to increase the use of EMR systems by ophthalmologists.