Abstract

BackgroundProviding HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) to men who attend their partner's prenatal care is an intervention with potential to reduce HIV transmission to women and infants during the vulnerable period of pregnancy. Little is known about the acceptability of this intervention in global settings outside of Africa.MethodsWe conducted in-depth qualitative interviews to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators to prenatal care attendance for HIV VCT with 20 men who did and 15 men who did not attend prenatal care with their partners at Hospital Conceiçao in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Men were recruited at the labor and delivery unit at Hospital Conceiçao via a scripted invitation while visiting their newborn infant. Interviews lasted from 35–55 minutes and were conducted in Portuguese by a local resident trained extensively in qualitative methods. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated, and then analyzed using Atlast.ti software. An analysis of themes was then conducted using direct quotes and statements. We applied and adapted the AIDS Risk Reduction Theoretical Model and HIV Testing Decisions Model to the qualitative data to identify themes in the 35 interviews.ResultsIf offered HIV testing during prenatal care, all men in both groups stated they would accept this intervention. Yet, individual, relationship and systemic factors were identified that affect these Brazilian men's decision to attend prenatal care, informing our final conceptual model. The men interviewed had a general understanding of the value of HIV prevention of mother to child transmission. They also described open and communicative relationships with their significant others and displayed a high level of enthusiasm towards optimizing the health of their expanding family. The major barriers to attending prenatal care included perceived stigma against HIV infected individuals, men’s lack of involvement in planning of the pregnancy as well as inconvenient scheduling of prenatal care, due to conflicting work schedules.ConclusionsBrazilian men displayed high levels of HIV-related knowledge as well as open communication about HIV testing; especially when compared to findings from African studies. Future efforts should reorient prenatal care towards providing care to the entire family with a clear focus on protecting the infant from preventable diseases. Formally inviting men to prenatal care and providing them an acceptable medical excuse from work may enhance male involvement.

Highlights

  • Engaging men in prenatal care has potential as a tool to protect pregnant women and infants from preventable infectious diseases

  • The men interviewed had a general understanding of the value of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention of mother to child transmission

  • Men perceive that attending prenatal care is “unmanly.” [4,9,11,12,13,14] In some African countries, cultural norms dictate that it is unacceptable for a woman to “lead” or tell the husband what to do. [11,15] this has not been evaluated in other cultural contexts where HIV continues to be a problem, such as Latin America

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Engaging men in prenatal care has potential as a tool to protect pregnant women and infants from preventable infectious diseases. Gender roles confer power to men to make at least 75% of decisions related to women’s health issues.[1] In African countries, prenatal male involvement has been shown to improve acceptance of HIV testing in women, reduce negative outcomes of disclosure to partner, increase condom use, improve ART compliance and infant feeding strategies and decrease HIV infection in infants.[2,3,4,5,6] Testing and treating men for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) allows individuals to obtain treatment and adopt safer behaviors to decrease transmission. Providing HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) to men who attend their partner’s prenatal care is an intervention with potential to reduce HIV transmission to women and infants during the vulnerable period of pregnancy. Little is known about the acceptability of this intervention in global settings outside of Africa

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call