Abstract

In viewing potential impact of recent technological change upon economy and labor market, American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) recently concluded that the United States-indeed every industrialized nation-is undergoing a scientific, technological, economic revolution every bit as significant as industrial revolution itself [quoted in Bamber and Lansbury 1989, 41]. Similarly, widespread application of microelectronics led Harley Shaiken [1984] to claim that we are moving from of automated equipment to generation. The first generation entailed automation of single work processes, allowing workers to perform individual tasks at a faster rate. The second generation ties separate work processes into integrated systems, creating entirely new work processes. The effects this new technology have on workplace organization and employment patterns have been hotly debated. Some authors have suggested that microelectronics may facilitate individual's control of work by decentralizing production, eliminating boring and dangerous jobs, enhancing skills, and increasing leisure time.1 For example, Isaac Asimov once wrote that it will leave to human beings tasks that are intrinsically human, such as sports, entertainment, and scientific research [quoted in Friedrich 1980, 83]. Others have insisted on differentiating between potential of microelectronics and reality of its use. In this view, integrated production systems transfer control of work process from shop-

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call