Abstract
This article reports the result of an empirical investigation into the operation of sentence discounts in the Crown Court. It focuses, in particular, on the extent to which judges comply with section 48 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and discusses (inter alia) the relationship between sentence discounts and the nature of the charges faced by the defendant, the strength of the prosecution case and the choice between custodial and non-custodial sentences. It also examines the relative use made of sentence discounts and the nature and relevance of Court of Appeal guidance. The article begins by describing the socio-legal context in which sentence discounts operate and, following description of the research methodology and presentation of the results, concludes with an assessment of the implications of the research for sentencing policy and practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
