Baptist ethics of conscientious objection to military service in South Africa: the watershed case of Richard Steele

F Hale

doi:10.4314/actat.v25i2.49013

Abstract

Although the Baptist Union of Southern Africa included relatively few outspoken critics of the apartheid system, during the 1970s and 1980s a small number of its younger members confronted the military system which supported that system of social engineering by refusing to comply with military conscription. Particularly noteworthy among these dissenters was Richard Steele, who had been influenced by the Anabaptist traditionof pacifism in the United States of America. Like his cousin and fellow Baptist, Peter Moll, he countered prevailing sentiments and practices within his denomination by going to prison rather than serve in the South African Defence Force. Steele’s action met with little support in the Baptist Union.

Highlights

The Baptist Union of Southern Africa included relatively few outspoken critics of the apartheid system, during the 1970s and 1980s a small number of its younger members confronted the military system which supported that system of social engineering by refusing to comply with military conscription
During the last two decades of the twentieth century international scholarship shed light on the history of conscription and conscientious objection thereto in the Republic of South Africa as that country’s apartheid policy and the military apparatus which supported it came under severe critical fire
The Steele case will be considered in the context of the history of military conscription and conscientious objection thereto in South African history

Summary

Introduction

The Baptist Union of Southern Africa included relatively few outspoken critics of the apartheid system, during the 1970s and 1980s a small number of its younger members confronted the military system which supported that system of social engineering by refusing to comply with military conscription. BAPTIST ETHICS OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO MILITARY SERVICE IN SOUTH AFRICA: THE WATERSHED CASE OF

Results

Conclusion