Abstract
ABSTRACTMainstream models that allow for financial operations are characterized by the understanding of banks as intermediaries of outside money (IOM). This approach to banks became dominant thanks to a peculiar rhetorical device by Tobin (1963). In recent years, however, this understanding is being increasingly questioned and an old view of banks as originators of inside money (OIM) is being reconsidered. The present article highlights the fundamental differences of these alternative doctrines from a money supply perspective and provides a simple theoretical argument to consider the limits of a point of view à la Tobin and regard the OIM banking theory more general than the IOM theory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
