Abstract

A large body of literature has blamed moral hazard behaviour by banks, for triggering the recent global financial crisis. Many reasons have been cited for such incentive distortion, e.g. the originate-to-distribute approach, regulatory capital arbitrage or the possibility of systemic bailouts. These motives were stoked by a low interest rate regime, in the wake of free inflow of capital in advanced economies. In contrast, we show that domestic banking competition, per se, reduces monitoring and fuels risky lending booms. Therefore, we claim that the incentive problem is due to banking competition, rather than bailout guarantees or capital account liberalization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.