Abstract
This article examines the complex circumstances surrounding the use of Reichsbank Loot, a film shown by the American Prosecution at the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. Used as part of the case against former Reichsbank President and Minister of Economics, Walther Funk, who was charged, inter alia, with crimes against humanity, the film appeared to provide straightforward visual evidence of some of the products of genocide that had been handled by the Reichsbank during the war. It consisted of a simple sequence of close-up views of valuables such as necklaces, rings, gems, broaches and fob watches. It also showed boxes full of gold dentures. Yet, ulike other films shown at Nuremberg, the veracity of this American-made film was called into question by a number of people, both at the trial and since, most notably by the convicted Holocaust denier David Irving. Now that it has recently become publicly available, the time is ripe for a reassessment of the film and the case against Funk that it supported. This article assesses the veracity of the film and offers some explanations why the silence relating to the film and the case more generally has persisted until now.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.