Abstract

Little is known about how bank capital affects bank stock performance. We show that capital does not affect returns unconditionally, but high-capital banks have higher risk-adjusted stock returns (alphas) than low-capital banks in bad times in and out of sample. Trading strategies earn 3.60%–4.44% annually. The results are robust to: using different bad times and capital definitions, alternative asset pricing models, and ex-ante expected returns; controlling for performance-type delistings, short-sale constraints, and trading costs; and dropping the largest or smallest banks. Our results seem to be driven by a “Surprised Investor Channel” rather than by an “Informed Investor Channel.”

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.