Abstract

This paper develops a new approach to band subset selection (BSS) for hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) which selects multiple bands simultaneously as a band subset, referred to as simultaneous multiple band selection (SMMBS), rather than one band at a time sequentially, referred to as sequential multiple band selection (SQMBS), as most traditional band selection methods do. In doing so, a criterion is particularly developed for BSS that can be used for HSIC. It is a linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) derived from adaptive beamforming in array signal processing which can be used to model misclassification errors as the minimum variance. To avoid an exhaustive search for all possible band subsets, two numerical algorithms, referred to as sequential (SQ) and successive (SC) algorithms are also developed for LCMV-based SMMBS, called SQ LCMV-BSS and SC LCMV-BSS. Experimental results demonstrate that LCMV-based BSS has advantages over SQMBS.

Highlights

  • IntroductionHyperspectral image classification has received considerable interest in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]

  • Of particular interest is a new concept of band subset selection (BSS) to address this issue which is quite different from the aforementioned simultaneous multiple band selection (SMMBS) methods in the sense of the search strategy to be used for finding an optimal set of multiple bands

  • Another SMMBS approach is to narrow the search range by specifying particular parameters to limit a small number of band subsets as candidate optimal sets, follow an optimization algorithm such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) [35] or firefly algorithm (FA) [36] to find an optimal band subset from the selected candidate set of band subsets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hyperspectral image classification has received considerable interest in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. One type of BP criterion is based on data characteristics or statistics such as variance, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), entropy, and information divergence (ID) to calculate a priority score for each of the individual bands in order to rank them [25] As a result, such BP-based SQMBS is generally unsupervised and is not adaptive to any particular application. Of particular interest is a new concept of band subset selection (BSS) to address this issue which is quite different from the aforementioned SMMBS methods in the sense of the search strategy to be used for finding an optimal set of multiple bands. It considers a selected band as a desired endmember. This is a tremendous advantage since such parameters must be adaptive to various applications

LCMV Criterion for BSS
Band Subset Selection
SQ LCMV-BSS
SC LCMV-BSS
Real Image Experiments
Purdue Indiana Indian Pines Scene
ROSIS Data
Methods
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.