Abstract

The theoretical description of the electronic structure of magnetic insulators and, in particular, of transition-metal oxides (TMOs), MnO, FeO, CoO, NiO, and CuO, poses several problems due to their highly correlated nature. Particularly challenging is the determination of the band gap. The most widely used approach is based on density functional theory (DFT) Kohn–Sham energy levels using self-interaction-corrected functionals (such as hybrid functionals). Here, we present a different approach based on the assumption that the band gap in some TMOs can have a partial Mott–Hubbard character and can be defined as the energy associated with the process Mm+(3dn) + Mm+(3dn) → M(m+1)+(3dn–1) + M(m–1)+(3dn+1). The band gap is thus associated with the removal (ionization potential, I) and addition (electron affinity, A) of one electron to an ion of the lattice. In fact, due to the hybridization of metal with ligand orbitals, these energy contributions are not purely atomic in nature. I and A can be computed accurately using the charge transition level (CTL) scheme. This procedure is based on the calculation of energy levels of charged states and goes beyond the approximations inherent to the Kohn–Sham (KS) approach. The novel and relevant aspect of this work is the extension of CTLs from the domain of point defects to a bulk property such as the band gap. The results show that the calculation based on CTLs provides band gaps in better agreement with experiments than the KS approach, with direct insight into the nature of the gap in these complex systems.

Highlights

  • Density functional theory (DFT) is commonly used to study the electronic structure of solids.[1]

  • The band gap calculation with DFT is well grounded, and it can be approximated by means of the analysis of the position of the Kohn−Sham (KS) energy levels.[1−5] The accurate estimation of the band gap is challenging since KS energy levels are evaluated at the system’s ground state and because of the wellknown problem arising from the choice of the proper DFT functional

  • The first case is that of Cu2O, a nonmagnetic oxide. It has a narrow Cu 3d band and can be used to verify if the procedure adopted for the calculation of the band gap using the charge transition level (CTL) is sufficiently accurate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Density functional theory (DFT) is commonly used to study the electronic structure of solids.[1]. The band gap calculation with DFT is well grounded, and it can be approximated by means of the analysis of the position of the Kohn−Sham (KS) energy levels.[1−5] The accurate estimation of the band gap is challenging since KS energy levels are evaluated at the system’s ground state and because of the wellknown problem arising from the choice of the proper DFT functional. The calculation of the band gap is usually based on the analysis of the position of the Kohn−Sham (KS) energy levels,[2] despite the fact that DFT is a ground-state theory and that Kohn−Sham orbital energies provide, in principle, just a crude approximation of the band gap. Kohn−Sham band gaps are widely and universally used due to their simplicity and rapid calculation

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.