Abstract
The article explores the distinct development of Lithuanian and Latvian national self-awareness and the circumstances determining the differences by comparing different historical experience. It is inferred that the differences were conditioned by the unlike estate structure of both nations. Due to the 13th century German expansion and opposition to it, the Northern Balts lost their nobility and became an exclusively peasant nation. The Lithuanians, conversely, preserved their estate structure; however, their nobility began to turn Polish linguistically in the 15th century, becoming bilingual, although maintaining Lithuanian ethnos for some time. In the 19th century, the bilingual Lithuanian community chose national self-awareness and patriotic attachment subject to the language employed by the individual; the Latvian community evaded this split, because historically it was monolingual, preserved Latvian identity and did not have to face the dilemma of national self-awareness in the 19th century. Greater consolidation of the Latvian nation on the basis of the Latvian language has been still felt up to now in the development of the language and minority policy in the Latvian Republic. In this respect, Lithuania demonstrates certain indecisiveness and lack of consistency, veiling it with liberalism and historical tradition. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7220/2335-2027.1.2
Highlights
The article explores the distinct development of Lithuanian
the circumstances determining the differences by comparing different historical experience
It is inferred that the differences were conditioned by the unlike estate structure
Summary
In this respect, Lithuania demonstrates certain indecisiveness and lack of consistency, veiling it with liberalism and historical tradition. Straipsnyje nagrinėjama skirtinga lietuvių ir latvių tautinės savimonės raida bei jos skirtumų priežastys, gretinant lietuvių ir latvių istorinę patirtį. Bilingvistinė lietuvių bendruomenė rinkosi tautinę savimonę ir pilietiškumą, priklausomai nuo individo vartojamos kalbos; latvių bendruomenė tokio skilimo išvengė, nes, istoriškai būdama monolingvistinė, išlaikė latvišką identitetą ir su tautinės savimonės dilema XIX a. Pagrindinės sąvokos: lietuviai, latviai, luomai, luominė kalba, tautinė savimonė, kalbos politika. Tačiau lietuviams iki šiol problemiška atrodo jų etninė savivoka – dėl jos atsiradimo laiko bei pačios sąvokos tebevyksta istorikų, kalbininkų ir etnologų diskusijos, kuriose esama mėginimų skaidyti lietuvio savimonę į baltiškąją (lietuviškąją) ir slaviškąją (baltarusiškąją, lenkiškąją). Straipsnyje mėginsime panagrinėti šių skirtumų atsiradimo priežastis, sugretinę lietuvių ir latvių istorinę patirtį
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.