Abstract

There is a growing interest in different aspects of carbonate reservoirs because of the importance of a number of large and giant carbonate oilfields in the Middle East and the Caspian Sea area. A number of these reservoirs are found in Palaeozoic carbonates. Silurian carbonates in the Silurian Baltic Basin form an excellent target for research because of the availability of numerous cores and outcrops and a limited impact of tectonic deformation in this marginal cratonic basin. This research is focused on Pridol ian carbonates, including shallow to deep basin facies, in the Lithuanian subsurface. In this paper, a new opinion will be presented about the sedimentological nature of the so-called reefs in this basin. The term reef appears often loosely applied to different types of deposits. Although the tectonic synsedimentary setting is undoubtedly important, it is however crucial to determine the exact nature of the reefal deposits because they tend to determine the nature of the carbonate system. In case of real reefs, i. e. bioconstructed deposits with a significant relief, carbonate platforms while otherwise ramps develop. The research shows that Pridolian carbonates lack reefs since the framework-constructing fauna is absent, and probably was absent during most of the Palaeozoic. Contrary to bioherms or reefs, biostromal deposits are formed on a ramp system and appear to be one of the main carbonate-producing parts of the system. The exact impor tance of the different facies belts in carbonate production is difficult to assess. It is crucial to distinguish between the ramp and the platform systems because these two end member systems react differently to diagenesis which ultimately determines the petrophysical properties and thus the reservoir quality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call