Abstract

Repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for subacute intimal dissections that produce symptoms after a period of 1 month or more is reluctantly performed for fear of extension and abrupt closure. Patients were identified with demonstrated intimal dissections (intimal contrast staining or frank intimal flap) at the time of initial PTCA who returned a mean of 17.5 weeks (range 9 to 50) later with recurrent chest pain. Repeat angiography revealed luminal compromise due to dissection rather than restenosis in 22 patients. Of these, 17 underwent repeat PTCA. Elective bypass surgery without attempted PTCA was chosen in the other 5 patients because of extensive intimal dissections (>2 balloon lengths) or involvement of critical branches. In the group of 17 patients who had repeat PTCA, 10 (group 1) had a frank intimal flap without persistent contrast staining after the initial PTCA, white 7 (group 2) had both persistent staining and a flap. Successful PTCA was performed in 13 of these 17 patients (76%). There were 2 abrupt closures and 2 unsatisfactory luminal openings. One of these patients required urgent coronary bypass surgery. All 10 group 1 patients had successful repeat procedures versus only 3 of 7 group 2 patients (p = 0.01). The 3 patients with the greatest degree of luminal compromise immediately after the initial PTCA had failed repeat PTCA attempts. These results suggest that repeat PTCA for subacute intimal dissections presenting as restenosis can be successfully performed in selected patients, and that the presence of contrast staining and the degree of luminal compromise by the dissection may be predictive of outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.