Balloon-Based Distal Protection Device Improves the Recovery of Left Ventricular Function after Primary Coronary Angioplasty

Abstract

Background and Objectives：Despite the high success rate of primary angioplasty in cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), myocardial reperfusion can frequently be compromised, mainly due to distal embolization, which can be effectively prevented with the use of distal protection devices. The goal of this study was to see whether PercuSurge ® , a balloon-based distal protection device, could improve myocardial reperfusion and late clinical outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty. Subjects and Methods：Between April 2002 and July 2003, 29 patients with AMI, within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms, were scheduled to undergo primary angioplasty using PercuSurge ® (PS group). Thirty patients were selected as a control group by matching the 5 clinical and angiographic variables; the clinical status and coronary angiograms were also prospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results： There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, including the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between two groups. The procedures were successful, without complications, in all patients from both groups. However, the PS group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of myocardial blush score of 3 (PS 58%, control 30%, p=0.001) and early ST-segment elevation resolution (PS 76%, control 47%, p=0.02) compared to the control group. The PS group also showed a greater LVEF at 60 days after the procedure (PS 51±5%, control 46±8%, p=0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidences of death or myocardial infarction between the two groups during the follow-up period. Conclusion：The use of the PercuSurge ® was found to be safe and feasible during primary angioplasty, and this system also improved the recovery of the left ventricular function as well as myocardial reperfusion following primary coronary angioplasty. (Korean Circulation J 2006;36:84-90)