Balancing risks? Responses and non-responses of mayfly larvae to fish and stonefly predators.

Abstract

In a series of laboratory experiments we examined the hypothesis that larvae of stream mayflies would respond to the presence of two different types of predators in such a way as to minimize their risk of being consumed by each. Positioning of larvae (whether they frequent the top, sides, or bottom of stones) of Baetis tricaudatus and Ephemerella subvaria was altered by the presence of predaceous stoneflies (Agnetina capitata) with a larger proportion of the population occurring on the upper surfaces, where the probability of encountering the predator was lowest. The presence of a benthivorous fish (Cottus bairdi) had no significant effects on positioning of the mayfly larvae. Lack of fish effects may reflect an inability of the mayflies to detect or respond to sculpins, or alternately may indicate that sculpins do not normally present a important predation risk for these mayflies. Failure of mayfly prey to account for fish predators when responding to the presence of stoneflies appcars to explain facilitation previously observed between stoneflies and sculpins.