Abstract

In order to reduce the cost of electricity produced by wave energy converters (WECs), the benefit of selling electricity as well as the investment costs of the structure has to be considered. This paper presents a methodology for assessing the control strategy for a WEC with respect to both energy output and structural fatigue loads. Different active and passive control strategies are implemented (proportional (P) controller, proportional-integral (PI) controller, proportional-integral-derivative with memory compensation (PID) controller, model predictive control (MPC) and maximum energy controller (MEC)), and load time-series resulting from numerical simulations are used to design structural parts based on fatigue analysis using rain-flow counting, Stress-Number (SN) curves and Miner’s rule. The objective of the methodology is to obtain a cost-effective WEC with a more comprehensive analysis of a WEC based on a combination of well known control strategies and standardised fatigue methods. The presented method is then applied to a particular case study, the Wavestar WEC, for a specific location in the North Sea. Results, which are based on numerical simulations, show the importance of balancing the gained power against structural fatigue. Based on a simple cost model, the PI controller is shown as a viable solution.

Highlights

  • Wave energy converters (WECs) have a high potential to contribute significantly to the world energy mix in the future

  • The Wavestar device is located at Danish Wave Energy Center (DanWEC) (Danish North Sea coast) near Hanstholm

  • Given that the exploitation of the potential energy embedded in ocean waves can play an important role in the future energy mix, so far much effort has been put in finding the best energy configuration for a WEC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wave energy converters (WECs) have a high potential to contribute significantly to the world energy mix in the future. In the context of wave energy, the term “passive controller” refers to a purely resistive control strategy such as proportional (P) controller, latching control, etc. The term “active controller” refers to those control strategies that imply energy feedback to the converter in order to increase the overall absorption. This class includes proportional-integral (PI) controller [10], suboptimal (PIDc) controller [11,12], MEC [13] and others. The advantage of using MPC is that it overcomes both the unrealistic amplitude of motion predicted by the theory and the inability to handle constraints in theoretical formulations

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call