Abstract

Atlantic menhaden is an important forage fish and the target of the largest fishery along the US East Coast by volume. Since 1999, managers at the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, stakeholders, and scientists have been interested in developing ecological reference points (ERPs) that account for menhaden’s role as a forage species. To accomplish this, we developed a suite of modeling approaches that incorporated predation on menhaden and changes in productivity over time and allowed for evaluation of trade-offs between menhaden harvest and ecosystem management objectives. These approaches ranged in complexity, from models with minimal data requirements and few assumptions to approaches with extensive data needs and detailed assumptions. This included a surplus production model with a time-varying intrinsic growth rate, a Steele-Henderson surplus production model, a multispecies statistical catch-at-age model, an Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) model with a limited predator and prey field, and a full EwE model. We evaluated how each model could address managers’ objectives and compared outputs across the approaches, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and management utility. All models produced estimates of age-1 + biomass and exploitation rate that were similar in trend and magnitude to the single-species statistical catch-at-age model, especially in recent years. While the less complex models were relativity easy to implement and update, they lacked key elements needed to manage multiple species simultaneously. More complex models required a wider array of data and were more difficult to update within the current management time-frames, but produced a more useful framework for managers. Ultimately, an EwE model of intermediate complexity coupled with the existing single-species assessment model was recommended for use in management.

Highlights

  • Over the past decade, there has been increasing interest in taking into account ecosystem impacts when managing forage species

  • We developed a suite of five models: a surplus production model with a time-varying intrinsic growth rate of the population, r, (SPM TVr; Nesslage and Wilberg, 2019), a Steele-Henderson surplus production model with predation (SPM S-H; Steele and Henderson, 1984; Uphoff and Sharov, 2018), a multispecies statistical catch-at-age model (MSSCAA; Curti et al, 2013; McNamee, 2018), an intermediate complexity Ecopath with Ecosim model with a limited predator and prey field (EwEMICE; Chagaris et al, 2020), and a full Ecopath with Ecosim model (EwE-Full; Buchheister et al, 2017a,b)

  • The surplus production model estimates of biomass exhibited less interannual variability than the BAM estimates because they did not capture the variability in recruitment that is estimated by the statistical catch-at-age model structure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been increasing interest in taking into account ecosystem impacts when managing forage species. Much of the work on this issue has concluded that forage fisheries should be managed more conservatively than single-species reference points would suggest, to ensure both the sustainable harvest of forage fish and to reduce ecosystem impacts from their removal. Hilborn et al (2017) pointed out that the ecological models used to develop the rule of thumb recommendations in Pikitch et al (2012) did not account for the weak, environmentally driven stock-recruitment relationship observed for most forage species or the differing selectivities of predators and fisheries, and may overstate the impact of fishing on forage fish abundance and predator population dynamics (but see the response of Pikitch et al, 2018). There remains a general consensus that ecosystem services should be considered when managing forage fisheries, and that developing models tailored to a specific ecosystem, species of interest, and management question provides the best results

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call