Abstract

N the spring of 1744, clergyman Jonathan Edwards learned that a number of boys in his parish had Books in keeping, which they improved to promote lascivious and obscene Discourse among the young People. Because the boys were subject to the discipline of the church, Edwards put the matter to the brethren, who appointed a committee to investigate the incident. The committee ultimately secured confessions and promises to reform from several of the accused, thus bringing the matter to an apparently satisfactory conclusion. According to an account written by fellow minister Samuel Hopkins some fifteen years later, however, this minor disciplinary proceeding occasioned a major controversy, which drove a wedge between the minister and his parishioners. In Hopkins's opinion, the so-called bad book affair seemed in a great Measure to put an end to Mr. Edwards's Usefulness at Northampton, and doubtless laid a Foundation for the congregation's 1750 vote to dismiss him.' Ever since Hopkins's early assessment, scholars have been trying to understand how such a powerful and successful clergyman as Edwards could have been so summarily ousted from Northampton, and many have followed Hopkins's lead in attending to the specifics of the bad book affair. A majority of the boys implicated in the scandal were members of Northamp-

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.