Bacteroides fragilis – потенциальный маркер эффективной трансплантации микробиоты при лечении острой реакции «трансплантат против хозяина»

Abstract

Summary Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), as any other medical procedure, requires standardization of results, approaches, monitoring of its dynamics and microbiota engraftment evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare efficiency and results of PCR and 16S RNA-based sequencing in order to trace the dynamics of microbiota composition after FMT. Patients and methods The prospective, single-center study included 27 patients with acute intestinal and chronic (overlap syndrome) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) developed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). FMT in 19 cases was performed, mostly, with ingestible capsules, eight placebo-treated patients were included into control group. Quantitative changes of different bacterial groups in fecal microbiota were assessed by means of real-time multiplex PCR, being compared with16S rRNA sequencing technique at the terms of D+3, D+16, D+30, D+60 and D+120 following FMT. Clinical response was determined by 4 scales evaluating intestinal syndrome and GvHD grade. Results When evaluating stool consistence according to Bristol scale as an index of GvHD therapy efficiency, we have observed complete clinical response by the D+120 after FMT in nine cases (47% with Bristol score of ≤4 points), and nine patients (47%) showed improved stool properties (>4 points). In the placebo group, complete or partial response was revealed, respectively, in one (13%), and four cases (50%) on the D+120. Multiplex PCR of fecal microbiota has shown a different time course in FMT- and placebo-treated patients, when compared to their initial (pre-FMT) levels. Total bacterial mass and copy numbers of distinct microbial species exhibited sufficient increase after FMT. Such shifts were demonstrable on D+30 for total microbial mass (p=0.002); Escherichia coli (p=0.001); Bacteroides fragilis group (p=0.05); Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (p=0.005). Meanwhile, the numbers Lactobacillus spp., and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, generally, were not changed over this time period. Moreover, in the control group (placebo) we have not found significant fecal microbiota changes against initial levels during 120 days monitoring period. Over 120 days of observation, we have also found some differences of the microbiota dynamics for the subgroups with complete response and partial/no response: Bifidobacterium spp. (р<0.047), E.coli (р<0.00047), B. fragilis group (p=5.6×10-5), F.prausnitzii (р<0.0062). Conclusions 1. Quantitative PCR of the major bacterial groups of gut microbiota, e.g., Bifidobacterium spp., E. coli, B. fragilis group, F. prausnitzii could be used as microbiological markers for evaluation of changing microbial landscape after FMT as a routine molecular biology technique. 2. The genocopy counts of B. fragilis group correlate with clinical response in the patients with intestinal GvHD after HSCT, either with, or without FMT procedure.