Abstract
Three methods of estimating bacterial productivity were compared using parallel samples of Atlantic Ocean water (within 0.25-15 km of the Georgia coast). The frequency-of-dividing cells (FDC) method and the [(3)H]thymidine incorporation method gave results which were strongly correlated (r=0.97), but the FDC estimates were always higher (X2 to X7) than the [(3)H]thymidine estimates. Estimates of bacterial productivity ranged from 2-4×10(8) cells·l(-1)·h(-1) at 0.25 km from shore to 1-9×10(7)cells·l(-1)·h(-1) at 15 km. A method involving incubation of 3-μm filtrates and direct counting gave results that could not be easily translated into estimates of bacterial productivity. Application of the FDC method to sediment samples gave high productivity estimates, which could be not reconciled with productivity estimates based on sediment oxygen uptake.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.