Abstract

The bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is an important agricultural pest in U.S. cotton and is managed using transgenic hybrids that produce insecticidal proteins from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The reduced efficacy against H. zea caterpillars of Bt plants expressing Cry toxins is increasing in the field. In a first step towards understanding Bt cotton–bollworm–microbiota interactions, we investigated the internal bacterial microbiota of second–third stadium H. zea collected in the field from non-Bt versus Bt (WideStrike) cotton in close proximity (in North Carolina, USA). The bacterial populations were analyzed using culture-dependent and -independent molecular approaches. We found that WideStrike samples had a higher bacterial density and diversity per larva than insects collected from non-Bt cotton over two field seasons: 8.42 ± 0.23 and 5.36 ± 0.75 (log10 colony forming units per insect) for WideStrike compared to 6.82 ± 0.20 and 4.30 ± 0.56 for non-Bt cotton for seasons 1 and 2, respectively. Fifteen phyla, 103 families, and 229 genera were identified after performing Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA. At the family level, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae were the most abundant taxa. The Enterococcaceae family was comprised mostly of Enterococcus species (E. casseliflavus and another Enterococcus sp.). Members of the Enterococcus genus can acidify their environment and can potentially reduce the alkaline activation of some Bt toxins. These findings argue for more research to better understand the role of cotton–bollworm–bacteria interactions and the impact on Bt toxin caterpillar susceptibility.

Highlights

  • Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a fiber, feed, and food crop of global significance [1].The U.S is the third-largest cotton producer worldwide, with more than 10 million acres planted in 2016

  • Helicoverpa zea larvae were collected in August 2016 from non-Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (PHY425RF) and Bt (WideStrike, PHY499WRF, Cry1Ac + Cry1F) (Corteva, Wilmington, DE, USA) cotton fields located at the Upper Coastal Plain Research Station, Rocky Mount, NC, USA

  • Bollworms collected in that season from WideStrike (Bt) had a mean bacterial count ± SE of 8.42 ± 0.23, compared to 6.82 ± 0.20 for larvae collected in non-Bt cotton (Figure 2A; see Figure S1,) with a significant difference (Mann–Whitney U-test, W = 1, p = 0.005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a fiber, feed, and food crop of global significance [1]. The U.S is the third-largest cotton producer worldwide, with more than 10 million acres planted in 2016. As of July 2017, 85% of the U.S cotton was transgenic [2,3], developed in the 1990s by introducing into the plant the genes for the Cry protein toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) [4]. The toxins are activated in the alkaline, lepidopteran larval midgut [5]. Bt cotton has been in use for over two decades and has provided significant benefits, e.g., reducing the need for chemical insecticides. The number of insecticide applications was reduced by at least 50% compared to non-transgenic cotton in Arizona [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call