Abstract

The effect of Fluorine solutions on the surface and bacterial adhesion of lithium disilicate is a concern. The aim was to evaluate the surface roughness and the adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis on lithium disilicate ceramic, under the influence of different solutions containing Fluorine. Forty lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press Impulse) discs (2.5 × 5 mm) was divided into 4 groups (n = 10): artificial saliva (Group AS), 0.2% sodium fluoride (Group NaF), 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (Group APF), and mouthwash (Group MW). Roughness analyses were performed before and after the immersion. The surface aspect was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis were evaluated after immersion in the solutions. The data obtained were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Group APF presented a bigger roughness (3.263), statistically different to the other solutions. The bacterial adhesion in the Group APF (5.85) presented statistical difference to the other solutions. The SEM micrographs showed a rougher surface in Group APF. The 1.23% APF gel promoted major surface roughness and bacterial adhesion and could be inadequate for the use of patients with lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. Clinical significance: The Fluorine solution can affect the lithium disilicate ceramics, generating a rough and non-esthetic surface. This altered surface could be susceptible to bacterial adhesion, being directly related with periodontal health, the longevity of the restoration and the success of the rehabilitation.

Highlights

  • The growing valorization of appearance exhibited in current society promotes development of restorative materials with excellent esthetic properties [1]

  • Literature is scarce when assessing the influence of such solutions on lithium disilicate ceramics and their influence on bacterial adhesion

  • The present study evaluated the influence of different fluoride-containing solutions on the surface roughness of lithium disilicate ceramics, and the influence on the bacterial adhesion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The growing valorization of appearance exhibited in current society promotes development of restorative materials with excellent esthetic properties [1]. Ceramic dental restorations have gained wide popularity since they closely resemble natural teeth, principally when integration and balance exist between color, format and surface texture [1,2]. A recent retrospective study [8] of 43 partial and total lithium disilicate restorations demonstrated a 97.7% of cumulative survival rate, and 94.2% of cumulative success rate. Some solutions used in oral hygiene can affect the properties of some restorative materials [11,12,13]. Literature is scarce when assessing the influence of such solutions on lithium disilicate ceramics and their influence on bacterial adhesion

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call