Abstract
We analyze the market impact of a partial vertical integration whereby a subset of retail firms acquire, through a private placement operation, a non-controlling stake in the capital of an upstream firm, which supplies an essential input. In addition, we assume that this upstream firm can price discriminate between the retail firms which (now) own a stake in its capital and all of their retail rivals. We find that price discrimination is optimal and, compared to a vertical separation scenario, there is input foreclosure, a higher retail price, and lower social welfare, which suggests that, from a competition policy viewpoint, such partial vertical integrations should be analyzed with particular concern. On the other hand, incentives are such that conducting a private placement operation of the upstream firm’s capital yields gains from trade, and we are able to identify the optimal characteristics of such an operation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
