Abstract

The empirical study of language is a young field in contemporary linguistics. This being the case, and following a natural development process, the field is currently at a stage where different research methods and experimental approaches are being put into question in terms of their validity. Without pretending to provide an answer with respect to the best way to conduct linguistics related experimental research, in this article we aim at examining the process that researchers follow in the design and implementation of experimental linguistics research with a goal to validate specific theoretical linguistic analyses. First, we discuss the general challenges that experimental work faces in finding a compromise between addressing theoretically relevant questions and being able to implement these questions in a specific controlled experimental paradigm. We discuss the Granularity Mismatch Problem (Poeppel and Embick, 2005) which addresses the challenges that research that is trying to bridge the representations and computations of language and their psycholinguistic/neurolinguistic evidence faces, and the basic assumptions that interdisciplinary research needs to consider due to the different conceptual granularity of the objects under study. To illustrate the practical implications of the points addressed, we compare two approaches to perform linguistic experimental research by reviewing a number of our own studies strongly grounded on theoretically informed questions. First, we show how linguistic phenomena similar at a conceptual level can be tested within the same language using measurement of event-related potentials (ERP) by discussing results from two ERP experiments on the processing of long-distance backward dependencies that involve coreference and negative polarity items respectively in Dutch. Second, we examine how the same linguistic phenomenon can be tested in different languages using reading time measures by discussing the outcome of four self-paced reading experiments on the processing of in-situ wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese and French. Finally, we review the implications that our findings have for the specific theoretical linguistics questions that we originally aimed to address. We conclude with an overview of the general insights that can be gained from the role of structural hierarchy and grammatical constraints in processing and the existing limitations on the generalization of results.

Highlights

  • The study of language from an experimental point of view is a relatively young field in linguistics

  • Summarizing the main results of the event-related potentials (ERPs) experiments discussed within our first test case, we first showed that gender mismatch effects in sentences containing cataphora result in anterior negativities in the 300–420 ms time-window when the gender of the antecedent mismatches that of the pronoun in no-constraint conditions

  • Based on the hypotheses put forth in the section Test Case 2 for wh-question formation strategies across languages, the results obtained by Pablos et al for the processing of in-situ questions containing complex and simplex wh-phrases in Mandarin support the approach in which the question interpretation is only considered when the wh-phrase is encountered, and not before

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of language from an experimental point of view is a relatively young field in linguistics. We examine linguistic phenomena that are similar at the conceptual level but different in their specific instantiations by investigating long-distance dependencies that involve either coreference of a cataphoric pronoun, or the backward interpretation of a negative polarity item in Dutch These two linguistic phenomena have in common that the licensee always precedes its licensor and that the cue for how to identify a licensor rests upon the hierarchical structure. At the wh-phrase position, the parser might need to backtrack to the left periphery to establish a dependency in order to interpret the wh-word In relation to this second phenomenon, we discuss four self-paced reading experiments by Pablos et al (submitted). In the section Studies on the neural architecture of language we discuss how the research question can evolve from its starting point to its end point so that it becomes an empirically testable question

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call