Abstract
The differences in classification and training performance of three- and four-layer (one- and two-hidden-layer) fully interconnected feedforward neural nets are investigated. To obtain results which do not merely reflect performance on a particular data set, the networks are trained on various distributions, which are themselves drawn from a distribution of distributions. Experimental results indicate that four-layered networks are more prone to fall into bad local minima, but that three- and four-layered networks perform similarly in all other respects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
